The late Madhaviah Krishnan born in Tirunelveli on June 30, 1912, was a pioneering Indian wildlife photographer, writer and naturalist. He studied in the Tirunelveli Hindu High School and developed an interest in literature, art and nature. In his article ‘A Bird Emblem for India‘ published in 1961, says that a decision was made to select a bird as the national emblem of India at a meeting of the Indian Board for Wildlife held in Ootacammund. The Swan, the Peacock, the Sarus crane, the Brahminy kite, and the Bustard were considered against the following criteria for the bird to be declared ‘national’:
- It must be well distributed within the country.
- It must be recognizable to the average person.
- It must lend itself to the formal depiction, i.e., abstract depiction on Government publications, etc.
- It must not be confused with the bird emblem of any other nation.
- It must be associated with Indian myths and legends and represented in ancient Indian art and sculpture.
The choice was the peacock and was declared the “National Bird of India”.
Now, to the bane of India, we have the following declaration from Mahesh Chandra Sharma, a so-called eminent Judge of the Rajasthan High Court judge, before his retirement on June 1, 2017:
“Peacocks don’t have sex. The peacock is a lifelong brahmachari (celibate). It never has sex with the peahen. The peahen gets impregnated after swallowing the tears of the peacock.”
What would this ‘eminent and keen observing‘ judge of the Rajasthan High Court say if he sees this video?
- Madhaviah Krishnan (en.wikipedia.org)
- Peacocks Don’t Have Sex, Says Judge Who Recommended Cow As National Animal (ndtv.com)
- Peacock a ‘brahmachari,’ they do not have sex says Rajasthan HC judge (oneindia.com)