In a right angled triangle, the square of the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angle) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides.
Pythagoras’ theorem can be written as an equation relating the lengths of the sides a, b and c:
where c represents the length of the hypotenuse, and a and b represent the lengths of the other two sides.
If the length of both a and b are known, then c can be calculated as follows:
If the length of hypotenuse c and any one side (a or b) are known, then the length of the other side can be calculated with the following equations:
The Pythagorean theorem is named after the Greek mathematician Pythagoras of Samos, an Ionian Greek philosopher, mathematician, and founder of the religious movement called Pythagoreanism whose central tenet was that numbers constitute the true nature of things.
Pythagoras is credited with the discovery and proof of the theorem. But it is often argued that the knowledge of the theorem predates him. Some claim that Babylonian mathematicians understood the equation, but there is not much of evidence for this claim.
Today, while surfing the internet I read a Tamil article in a website and I was impressed by the following Tamil quatrain:
ஓடும் நீளம் தனை ஒரே எட்டுக்
கூறு ஆக்கி கூறிலே ஒன்றைத்
தள்ளி குன்றத்தில் பாதியாய்ச் சேர்த்தால்
வருவது கர்ணம் தானே.
oadum neelam thanai orae ettuk
kuru aakki koorilae ondraith
thalli kundraththil paathiyaaych cherthaal
varuvathu karnam thaanae
Divide the running length into eight equal parts. Discard one of the divided parts and add half the height. Isn’t the result the hypotenuse?
And here is another example:
a = 4
b = 3
So, c = (4 – 4/8) + (3/2) = 5
The article says that the author of this quatrain is a sage, mathematician, and poet named Bothaināyaṉār, and that the advantage of this Bothaināyaṉār’s theorem over Pythagorean theorem is that the calculations can be easily done without calculating the square root.
By the way, this quatrain failed to produce the answer if a is greater than b, for example if a = 3 and b = 4. So, I swapped the values of a and b.
Next I tried the following:
Try #1: a = 12, b = 6
sqr((12 x 12) + ( 6 x 6)) = 13.416407864998738178455042012388
(12 – (12 / 8)) + (6 / 2) = 13.5
Try #2: a = 13, b = 9
sqr((13 x 13) + (9 x 9)) = 15.811388300841896659994467722164
(13 – (13 / 8)) + (9 / 2) = 15.875
Try #3: a = 15, b = 12
sqr((15 x 15) + (12 x 12)) = 19.209372712298546059464653023865
(15 – (15 / 8)) + (12 / 2) = 19.125
In most cases, the results obtained using Bothaināyaṉār’s method was not accurate even to the first decimal place.
Today, I spent a good amount of my valuable time on the net to learn about this person named Bothaināyaṉār, but was not able to gather any information about him. I doubt whether this person ever existed.
It’s funny that the Tamil word “Bothai” means inebriation and the word “nāyaṉār” translates to lord , master, or devotee. So, is someone playing a prank using the name Bothaināyaṉār (Devotee of Inebriation)?
The Tamil community and I would be glad if anyone out there could give any relevant and useful information on this subject. Your comments are welcome.So, I think I’ll better stick to the Pythagorean theorem.
- Greek Mathematics – Pythagoras (libraryindus.wordpress.com)
- Animated Pythagoras (newtonexcelbach.wordpress.com)
- Using Geogebra to Geometrically Prove Pythagorean Theorem (2nerdy.wordpress.com)
- Pythagoras’ Theorem (kahshiu.wordpress.com)
- Tutorial: The Trigonometric Identities! (mathematicalmischief.wordpress.com)
- Story of Greek Mathematics (libraryindus.wordpress.com)
- Did Decimal Numerals originate from Tamil Numerals? (tvaraj.wordpress.com)
- Fractions used by Ancient Tamils (tvaraj.wordpress.com)
- Rapidity of Exponential Growth (tvaraj.wordpress.com)