abduction, abduction case, Alex Paul Menon, Aljazeera, AmensityInternational, API, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh government, Collector kidnap, Communist Party of India, District Collector, District Collector of Sukma, district magistrate, doctors, Food for Thought, India, insurgents, Maoism, Maoist, Maoist insurgency, maoist insurgents, Maoists, Maoists' demand, Naxalite, News, NYT, Operation Green Hunt, postaday, Sukma, terrorism, terrorists, The Red Corridor, This is life, Tirunelveli district, tvaraj, WSJ
Even as the hostage crisis winds down, with the release of the Sukma DC currently under negotiation, urgent questions persist regarding the conduct of the state during these crises and, more broadly, the fundamentals of ‘negotiating with terrorists’ or with ‘hostage takers’. There has been much commentary on the state’s ‘capitulation’ and the obvious and adverse consequences, both of releasing active Maoists from jail, and of the ‘demonstration effect’ which will ‘naturally’ encourage future abductions, given the success of the present instances.
Originally posted on Arcana Intellego:
Weekly Assessments & Briefings
Volume 10, No. 43, April 30, 2012
View original 3,812 more words